Abstract

Social scientists have long been interested in the relationship between financial incentives and performance. This subject has gained new relevance with the advent of web-based “crowd-sourcing” models of production. In recent decades, recruiting participants from crowd-sourcing platforms has gained considerable popularity among human-robot trust researchers. A large number of outliers due to lack of enough attention and focus of the experiment participants or due to participants' boredom and low engagement, especially in crowd-sourcing experiments, has always been a concern for researchers in the field of human-robot interaction. To overcome this problem, financial incentives can be a solution. In this study, we examine the effects of performance-related compensation on the experiment data quality, participants' performance, and accuracy in performing the assigned task, and experiment results in the context of a human-robot trust experiment. We designed an online human-robot collaborative search task and recruited 120 participants for this experiment from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (AMT). We tested participants' attention, performance, and trust in the robotic teammate under two conditions: constant payment and performance-based payment conditions. We found that using financial incentives can increase the data quality and help prevent the random and aimless behavior of the participants. We also found that financial incentives can improve the participants' performance significantly and causes participants to put more effort into performing the assigned task. However, it does not affect the experiment results unless any measures are directly associated with the compensation value.